« Same difference | Main | A voice of reasonIn the »

If I were a rich man

From the New York Times editorial on the Michigan cases:

The court's analysis was far from perfect. In evaluating the undergraduate program, the majority was too quick to accept that all uses of race are equally suspect that helping disadvantaged blacks is akin to saving seats at the front of a bus for whites. The court also failed to recognize that the point scale, by giving a distinct but limited advantage to minority applicants, used just the sort of "plus" factor Bakke permitted.
Here's what the New York Times doesn't mention: the undergraduate program was not designed to "help disadvantaged blacks." Indeed, the exact opposite: the undergraduate program was designed to help already advantaged blacks.

The "point system" established by the University of Michigan gave a bonus to all disadvantaged people, regardless of skin color -- and under the system, an applicant could earn only one bonus in this area. (In other words, a poor black could get the plus for being poor, or for being black, but not both.) Hence, even in the absence of the black bonus, disadvantaged blacks would get the boost, by virtue of being disadvantaged. In short, the only blacks who needed the "black boost "were middle-class or rich. In other words, the people who need it least.

So, what explains the editorial comment?
A) The New York Times didn't know how the program worked.
B) The New York Times was being deliberately misleading.
C) The New York Times thinks all blacks are inherently disadvantaged simply because of their skin color.
D) Some combination of the above.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.oobleck.com/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/776

Comments (1)

Richard:

The one thing that is clear from reading Sandra Day O'Connor's decision, is that the Supreme Court has declared that Blacks are inferior! After all she states that in 25 years, there should be enough Blacks who can compete with Whites so that colleges will no longer be able to use race as a factor in admissions. However, that is not the case now. This ruling should really boost minority self-esteem.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 24, 2003 4:17 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Same difference.

The next post in this blog is A voice of reasonIn the.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31