« How did we get here? | Main | Haliburton »

Uh oh!

There's some sort of strange dynamic going on in the coverage of this war. The media is manic-depressive, perhaps. Before the war started, they brought up their familiar bogeyman: the quagmire. When the CotW (Coalition of the Willing) quickly and successfully struck into Iraq, the media then acted as if the whole war were going to be a weekend getaway in scenic Asia. Then, when Iraqi forces had the temerity to resist, the media swung back into defeatest mode. Headlines blared horror stories of coalition "setbacks," as if being slowed down by a day were a brilliant counterstroke by the Iraqi military.

Now, with coalition forces just 50 miles from Baghdad, the media is acting as if Saddam Hussein has virtually won the war. And press conferences with U.S. military leaders take on a surrealist tone:

Q: What's going on? How can this be happening?
A: It's a war.

Q: Have we lost already?
A: Yes.

Q: Did you expect Iraqis to shoot back? Have we lost already?
A: Yes, we've lost, and no, this whole shooting thing has caught us by surprise. We didn't even expect them to have ammunition. We figured they'd just fart at us a few times. Boy, were we stupid. They really outmaneuvered us with that one.

Q: What about these Iraqi tactics? Some of them fight, and then run away and hide. Did you ever hear of these tactics? Have we lost already?
A: Yeah, we lost already. It never occurred to us that they might use unconventional tactics. Our military academies only taught us how to move forward and back. All this Iraqi sneaking around from side-to-side has confused us. Thank god the media alerted us to the fact that the Iraqi military might fight dirty. We'd never have thought of that one.

Q: We hear that some Americans were captured. Have we lost the war already?
A: Of course we lost the war. We didn't think a single American soldier would be injured or captured. Now all our plans are out the window! Whatever shall we do?

Q: Didn't you predict that this war would only take a short time? It's been almost a week, and the war isn't over! What's going on? Have we lost already?
A: Yeah. We don't know what we were thinking. We really thought that the boys would be home by Monday. Gosh, we blew it.

Q: Are we going to lose the war?
A: Yes. Look for Iraqi tanks on the banks of the Potomac tomorrow. Thursday at the latest.

I certainly don't mean to make light of the plight of American POWs, and the fallen soldiers are a tragedy. Even one dead is one death too many. But it's a war, and these things happen -- and yet, if you listen to the media, you'd think that a single casualty signals that this is Vietnam, and that the marines might as well pack their bags now and go home. We're just a few days from seizing Baghdad, depending on how stiff Republican Guard resistance is. In less than a week, our troops crossed half a country, brushing aside all resistance. And yet we're already hearing, "I told you so"s from the media. Sheesh. Shouldn't there be a rule that you have to wait at least a week before commenting on a war's success?

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.oobleck.com/mt3/mt-tb.cgi/658

Comments (4)

Gary Collard:

Repeated from the previous reply - the elite media really needs a lot of things to go wrong, if nto the speciousnes of much of the entire anti-war argument goes away. Look at how many of the anti arguments have been debunked in the first 7 days.

Gary Collard:

Should read "speciousness...is exposed." Woops.

Dave S:


I don't really see how the linked editorial is biased or defeatist. Recognizing that there will be costs to this war is important, and if people on the right were smart, they wouldn't be so offended by attempts to temper the unrealistic expectations that many people have had.

There are certainly examples of liberal bias in the media, but I really think in this case you're overreacting, David.

Dave, I wasn't just referring to that editorial; if anything, the cable news coverage has been worse. My little dialogue, of course, was extreme hyperbole, but I do think the editorial illustrates extreme negativity, as if Bush had promised a 3-day war and it was taking 6-days, so he lied.

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on March 25, 2003 5:48 AM.

The previous post in this blog was How did we get here?.

The next post in this blog is Haliburton.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Powered by
Movable Type 3.31